New article in Dallas Morning News

My hometown newspaper has an interview with Colonel Killian's secretary on its website (you do have to register, but it's free and shouldn't you keep up with what the MSM is up to, especially these days?). It's interesting for spin ....

The secretary was very specific in remembering specific people and dates when talking to the newspaper and she says with absolute certainty that these are not documents that she typed and that she would have typed them up (not Killian)....

....but then she goes on to say that "they accurately reflect the viewpoints of Lt. Col. Killian and documents that would have been in the personal file"

This last statement comes a few paragraphs after she called the President "unfit for office" and "selected, not elected"

Well, at least the Dallas Morning News was up front about her political leanings. That's a lot more than CBS was regarding Jim Moore.

Democrats, of course, will immediately jump on the idea that documents such as the ones put forth by CBS did actually exist, regardless of the fact that Colonel Killian's own secretary, who would have typed such documents for him (she confirms what his wife said about him not typing), says that these specific documents are FORGERIES! But the story's true....Sorry, but in court, I believe they call that the "fruit of the poisonous tree". If one piece of evidence relied on to support an argument is poisoned, then the entire argument is tainted. Of course, all those Democratic lawyers, including those two who want to lead this country, have ignored that so far.

Did Bush get preferential treatment and shirk some of his guard duties? I honestly don't know and I don't care as far as the issue influencing my vote for President (as if no one can tell by looking at the countdown calendar on my website whom I'm voting for). I care about what is going to happen to my friends in Iraq. I care that the government does its best to ensure an event like 9/11 never happens again. I care about how high my taxes are. I care about whether or not Social Security will be there in 23 years when I'm eligible to retire from my job. Shouldn't that be what the election is about....the future?